A DocRaptor alternative

This one is a genuine engine choice, not a pricing argument. DocRaptor uses PrinceXML; Filecook uses Chromium. They are good at different things.

HTML PDF PNG JPEG URL
No credit card required · 500 free renders/month

Filecook vs DocRaptor at a glance

 FilecookDocRaptor
Rendering engineLatest ChromiumPrinceXML
Matches browser outputYes, by definitionClose, but a separate engine
CSS Paged Media depthChromium’s subsetExtensive — its main strength
JavaScript executionYesYes
Entry priceFree tier, then $9 / monthFrom $15 / month for 125 documents
Free tier500 renders / monthTest documents are free and watermarked
Self-hosted optionPerpetual licence availableNot offered

Competitor details checked August 2026 from public documentation and pricing pages. Products change — verify current terms with DocRaptor before deciding.

Pick DocRaptor when typography is the product

PrinceXML is widely regarded as the strongest HTML-to-PDF engine for print work, and that reputation is earned. If you are producing books, journals, or documents that lean on named page rules, running headers, cross-references, or fine control over widows and orphans, Prince does things Chromium simply cannot. We would rather tell you that than lose your trust later.

Pick Filecook when the browser is the source of truth

Most business documents are not typeset books. They are invoices, dashboards, statements, and certificates that were designed in a browser and need to come out looking the same.

  • What you see is what you get. Design in Chrome, render in Chrome — no second engine to develop a mental model for.
  • Modern CSS without caveats. Grid, Flexbox, container queries, and whatever ships in Chromium next.
  • Client-rendered content works. Charting libraries that draw to canvas or SVG at runtime render normally.
  • Lower entry cost. A free tier that runs real workloads, then $9 a month.

A useful test

Take your three most complicated documents and render them on both. If the differences are in page-break placement and hyphenation, Prince will likely win. If the differences are in layout fidelity to the original web page, Chromium will.

Frequently asked questions

Is Chromium worse than PrinceXML?
For advanced CSS Paged Media and fine typographic control, Prince is genuinely stronger. For matching a page as it appears in a browser, Chromium is the reference implementation. Neither is universally better.
Can I migrate my DocRaptor templates?
Usually, but expect to revisit Prince-specific CSS. Prince-only at-rules and properties have no Chromium equivalent and will need reworking.
Do you support modern CSS like Grid and Flexbox?
Yes. Filecook renders on the latest Chromium, so CSS Grid, Flexbox, custom properties, and modern selectors all behave exactly as they do in Chrome. If it looks right in your browser, it looks right in the PDF.
Can I use Google Fonts or my own web fonts?
Yes. Load them the normal way — an @import in your stylesheet, a <link> tag, or a self-hosted @font-face rule. The renderer waits for fonts to load before it captures the page.
Is there a free tier?
Yes — 500 renders a month, free forever, with no credit card required. That covers the playground, the full API, and both PDF and image output.

Keep reading

Ready to start cooking?

500 renders a month, free forever. No credit card, no sales call.